This page contains annotated news stories and press releases with commentary about land reform and the democratic process in British Columbia. Our comments are shown in red.
CRD backs ban on gas-tanker traffic
LNG traffic deemed too hazardous for Inside Passage route
Aug 14, 2008
By Bill Cleverley
Liquefied natural gas tankers have no place travelling up and down the Inside Passage, Capital Regional District directors say.
The CRD yesterday endorsed a resolution supporting the Powell River Regional District in calling on the federal government to ban LNG tankers from using the Inside Passage -- one of the most heavily travelled waterways in North America.
"In some cases the potential explosion from an LNG tanker is rated one step down from a nuclear explosion," Saanich director Vic Derman said.
"It is extraordinarily significant. We don't want those kinds of vessels in restricted, busy waterways unless you have absolutely no other option and I don't think that's the case here."
A similar resolution has been passed by the Islands Trust.
The resolution, which is to go to the Union of B.C. Municipalities for support this fall, also calls on the provincial government to require no greenhouse-gas emissions be allowed from gas-fired generating plants.
The Comox-Strathcona Regional District passed a resolution last year calling for no greenhouse-gas emissions from generation plants.
CRD directors took the action after hearing from Powell River Regional district chairman Colin Palmer and representatives from environmental groups Texada Action Now and the Dogwood Initiative.
They are all concerned about Alberta-based WestPac's plans to build a LNG terminal and power plant on Texada Island.
The CRD's environment committee earlier had recommended directors not make a decision until hearing from WestPac representatives, but the company opted not to address the board and instead provided a written backgrounder about its plans.
WestPac says the proposed power plant would have a capacity of 600 megawatts, expandable to 1,200. The company expects to bring in one LNG tanker -- about the size of a large cruise ship -- every seven to 10 days in the winter and every 20 to 30 days in the summer months.
Tankers would travel through Juan de Fuca Strait, up Haro Strait and then up the Strait of Georgia to Texada.
The estimated capital cost is $2 billion, and the project would provide 90 to 100 full-time jobs and up to 1,000 jobs during the three-year construction phase, the backgrounder says.
Derman said just the operation of an LNG system by itself produces substantial amounts of methane "which is a climate warming gas that's roughly 29 times as potent as carbon dioxide."
Saltspring Island director Gary Holman noted the resolution does not mention WestPac specifically, but rather is designed "to establish a set of principles under which such a project could proceed."
He said the issues that should be of concern to the board are the generation of greenhouse gases and safety and security.
"This resolution recommends to the province ... that they revise their energy plans so that they make their conditions applying to any fossil-fuel generation the same as for coal -- for zero emissions. That's not impossible, there are technologies, but they come with costs," Holman said.
"These tankers are sailing past our waters; past our neighbourhoods so to speak. There are serious safety and security concerns," he said.
The CRD yesterday endorsed a resolution supporting the Powell River Regional District in calling on the federal government to ban LNG tankers from using the Inside Passage -- one of the most heavily travelled waterways in North America.
"In some cases the potential explosion from an LNG tanker is rated one step down from a nuclear explosion," Saanich director Vic Derman said.
"It is extraordinarily significant. We don't want those kinds of vessels in restricted, busy waterways unless you have absolutely no other option and I don't think that's the case here."
A similar resolution has been passed by the Islands Trust.
The resolution, which is to go to the Union of B.C. Municipalities for support this fall, also calls on the provincial government to require no greenhouse-gas emissions be allowed from gas-fired generating plants.
The Comox-Strathcona Regional District passed a resolution last year calling for no greenhouse-gas emissions from generation plants.
CRD directors took the action after hearing from Powell River Regional district chairman Colin Palmer and representatives from environmental groups Texada Action Now and the Dogwood Initiative.
They are all concerned about Alberta-based WestPac's plans to build a LNG terminal and power plant on Texada Island.
The CRD's environment committee earlier had recommended directors not make a decision until hearing from WestPac representatives, but the company opted not to address the board and instead provided a written backgrounder about its plans.
WestPac says the proposed power plant would have a capacity of 600 megawatts, expandable to 1,200. The company expects to bring in one LNG tanker -- about the size of a large cruise ship -- every seven to 10 days in the winter and every 20 to 30 days in the summer months.
Tankers would travel through Juan de Fuca Strait, up Haro Strait and then up the Strait of Georgia to Texada.
The estimated capital cost is $2 billion, and the project would provide 90 to 100 full-time jobs and up to 1,000 jobs during the three-year construction phase, the backgrounder says.
Derman said just the operation of an LNG system by itself produces substantial amounts of methane "which is a climate warming gas that's roughly 29 times as potent as carbon dioxide."
Saltspring Island director Gary Holman noted the resolution does not mention WestPac specifically, but rather is designed "to establish a set of principles under which such a project could proceed."
He said the issues that should be of concern to the board are the generation of greenhouse gases and safety and security.
"This resolution recommends to the province ... that they revise their energy plans so that they make their conditions applying to any fossil-fuel generation the same as for coal -- for zero emissions. That's not impossible, there are technologies, but they come with costs," Holman said.
"These tankers are sailing past our waters; past our neighbourhoods so to speak. There are serious safety and security concerns," he said.
