Blogwood
You are here: Home Blog Politics can be deeply complex or as simple as 1 + 1 = 2
Saturday, September 15, 2012 by Will Horter

Politics can be deeply complex or as simple as 1 + 1 = 2

Politics can be deeply complex or as simple as 1 + 1 = 2

With your help we recently reached out to 6,877 of the Premier's constituents.

Here at Dogwood, we try to keep politics simple. We use new and old strategies to connect with people and bring them together into a formidable force on issues important to them, such as oil tankers.

We think this quote (from a retired MP) provides a lot of insight into what matters in politics: “There are only two kinds of people in this world … those who can hurt you at home, and everybody else.”

That’s why we are testing new technologies like automated phone calls to every household in the ridings of Premier Christy Clark and Enviroment Minister Terry Lake. These interactive calls — paid for with $20,000 in donations from No Tankers supporters like you — allow us to cut through the noise and identify new supporters while getting each constituent’s views on government inaction on oil tankers. The response has been amazing!

At the end of July we partnered with former federal Minister of Environment, Fisheries and Oceans David Anderson to call every household in Clark’s Point Grey riding. His message was simple: “I believe Clark needs to firmly say no to these risky projects.” As someone who volunteered on Clark’s leadership campaign, Anderson’s voice carries some weight.

We deployed the calls in Point Grey just after statements by Clark signalling that oil tanker and pipeline projects could win her approval for a price. Our calls reached 6,877 of Clark’s constituents (4,250 live, 2,627 voicemail) with a No Tankers message and informal poll.

In early September,we targeted Lake’s Kamloops-North Thompson riding with a call from Anderson relaying a similar message and connected with 7,497 (4,972 live, 2,525 voicemail) of Lake’s constituents.

The informal polls we conducted on the calls showed that the B.C. Liberal’s “Maybe, if the price is right” position doesn’t connect with people in either Point Grey or Kamloops. Eighty-one per cent of those polled in Point Grey and 69% in Kamloops-North Thompson said Clark and Lake respectively should say ‘no’ to both Enbridge and Kinder Morgan’s oil tanker and pipeline proposals. Of the majority that don’t support oil tankers on B.C.’s coast, more than 90% in Point Grey and 88% in Kamloops-North Thompson said that neither “a deal with Alberta for more money” nor “promises of world class safety from project proponents” would convince them to support these risky oil tanker-pipeline proposals.

Kim Hobbs, a Point Grey constituent who received a call, said “No amount of money will make me change my mind.”

With the provincial election only nine months away, Dogwood Initiative is keeping it simple. It may not be as simple as 1 +1 = 2, but 6,877 + 7,497 is pretty straightforward.

With your help Dogwood Initiative will continue to do everything we can to get every MLA and party leader to stand up against the expansion of oil tankers on B.C.’s magnificent coast. Thanks to all the good old on-the-ground organizing happening across the province - almost 23,000 new No Tankers supporters since June - the people powered movement to stop the expansion of oil tankers on B.C’s coast is becoming more formidable by the day.

Next up: Telephone Town halls targeting constituents of key decision makers.

 

r. nyirfa says:
Sep 16, 2012 04:01 PM

do you honestly think that Cristy Clark will get it through her thick head or will she go for the money? my bet is she'll gfo dfor the money, the short fall in revenues they counted on from natural gas, which tanked four years ago can't be made up and everyone knows that they will try to lie their way out of this mess the same way they did with the hst.

Jeffrey A Beck says:
Sep 16, 2012 04:41 PM

British Columbia's pristene wilderness should not be forsale at any price!!

Anon says:
Sep 16, 2012 04:57 PM

Christy Clark's position regarding the pipeline reminds me of the story of a man at a local bar asking a pretty lady if she would sleep with him for million dollars. Sure, she said. How about a hundred dollars? A hundred dollars, what do you think I am! We already know what you are, we're just haggling over the price.

Chris Armstrong says:
Sep 16, 2012 06:17 PM

NEVER GET COMPLACENT! Although Enbridge's 10-year pipeline track record proves beyond all question their ingrained corporate INCOMPETENCE, and they lie and treat us like idiots; Big Oil has great patience, very deep pockets, a longterm big (mostly hidden) agenda, and big supporters in big Government. The NGP/Northern Gateway Pipeline carrying very highly abrasive "dilbit" would be a guaranteed disaster for British Columbia! None of the buyers care a wit about BC, its environment, or its future generations. They want our resources, period! We should refine the dilbit in Canada, close to the source, and sell a much higher value product to the world, possibly even involving MUCH LOWER RISK pipelining. That is where Big Oil can put their money.

Robert Trotter says:
Sep 17, 2012 10:54 AM

Our leaders still refuse to recognize that buring fossil fuels is the direct cause of climate warming and the weather catastrophes that are occurring. And how ignorant is our Prime Minister of the realities of international power politices? China is in imperialist mode right now and Harper gives their government oil company real, that is money, power over our resources. He fights for Canadian sovreignty in the north and gives it up where most of us live. For BC politics, the illiberal Liberals have been about enriching their friends at the expense of the rest of us. Time for a change

NickN says:
Sep 17, 2012 01:38 PM

Vote ABC. Anyone But Christy!

Sheila M. says:
Sep 17, 2012 02:46 PM

Canada needs jobs and oil so if Enbridge insists on extracting oil from the tar sands, why isn't our government insisting on refining it on site, providing jobs to Canadians then piping it to Ontario and Eastern Canada, where they rely on expensive, imported oil. The refined oil is safer, the terrain is safer and Canada wins on both accounts. We should be doing the same thing with our lumber: rather than shipping raw logs across the ocean we should be processing it here in Canada then selling the value-added products on the market providing jobs for Canadians. When will Harper quit selling off our resources and start to help Canadians with good paying jobs?

Bob Morgan says:
Sep 17, 2012 08:10 PM

I am not so sure about ABC. What do the Conservatives stand for? We need more NDP, and get at least the leader of the BC Green Party into the legislature

Kim says:
Sep 18, 2012 01:37 AM

The tar sands in Alberta were once pristine and natural also, look at them now. It is our insatiable appetite for oil that destroys our environment, it's up to us to change. We really need to look at how we can reduce our dependence on this environmentally devastating resource
because this destruction will just keep moving, next it will be up north. Time to get off the pipe people and demand less harmful alternatives.

Andrea A Johnson says:
Oct 14, 2012 06:28 PM

Lots of beneficial in a row. I give rise to bookmarked your place.

Davian says:
Oct 18, 2012 06:05 PM

That's the smart thinikng we could all benefit from.

Matthew R Giese says:
Oct 20, 2012 06:37 AM

Can't say enough about this website – its alot better than mine.

Add comment

You can add a comment by filling out the form below. Plain text formatting. Comments are moderated.

Stand up for BC. Join us.

Authorized by Dogwood Initiative; Will Horter registered sponsor under the Election Act. 250.370.9930