Blogwood
You are here: Home Blog NoTankers: On the Path to Victory
Friday, August 06, 2010 by Eric Swanson

NoTankers: On the Path to Victory

NoTankers: On the Path to Victory

An oil spill cleanup worker in Michigan (left), and the No Tankers/Pipelines float at this year's Vancouver Pride Parade (right)


On July 26th, it became apparent that Enbridge - the same company that wants to bring two tar sands pipelines and 225 oil supertankers per year to the north coast of BC – was responsible for a crude oil spill of close to 4 million litres into a Michigan river.

Dogwood Initiative sent out a Media Release making the obvious comment that the spill effectively debunks their claims of safety here in British Columbia. However, we don't need any more spills to do that. We don't need another morning to know that the sun will come up. Enbridge has been spilling oil for years. It’s not a question of if, it’s a question of when, where, and how large. 

We don’t need another morning to know that the sun will come up

So, though Enbridge is now more pointedly making this argument for us, we here at Dogwood are happy to move on with actually winning this campaign to keep oil tankers out of BC’s north coast for good. That means no Enbridge Northern Gateway project, no CN Rail tankers from Prince Rupert or Kitimat, and no Kinder Morgan ‘Northern Leg’.

We may have to stomach additional spills occurring elsewhere in the world, but we can at least be sure that our own abundant coastline and salmon rivers are spared.

Here’s why we're going to win:
(click here to skip this and go straight to action)

 

  • Polling shows that 80% of British Columbians oppose oil tanker traffic on the north coast. This is an incredible pool of democratic muscle to flex.
  •  All nine First Nations on BC’s north coast have already made the decision to ban tar sands oil tankers. They issued a declaration in Vancouver, and they gathered in Kitimaat to cement it using their own traditional laws and governance systems. They have stated that they will not be bought out or divided in this matter. Plus, they’re joined by an additional 19 Interior First Nations in opposing Enbridge, e.g. click here. These Nations have more power than our provincial and federal governments, and the oil industry, would like to believe. 
  • Though Gordon Campbell’s public statements reveal support for the project, his opinion is more or less irrelevant. Jurisdiction over oil tankers and the pipeline route lies heavily with the federal government. Opposition to oil tankers polls higher than opposition to the HST in BC. Campbell would have to be insane to publicly support oil tankers. He knows this, so the only help our Premier can give Enbridge is to encourage us all to have faith in the project review process
These bullets are some of the reasons why we'll win. Click here to skip straight to the winning
  • The review process in question: the Joint Review Panel overseen by the National Energy Board, has failed to meet the Crown’s constitutional duties to First Nations. Thus, court challenges are likely. In addition, the entire federal review process would be dangerously de-legitimized if the project was somehow approved over the existing overwhelming public opposition. 
  • The Liberal Party of Canada and the NDP have committed to work towards a legislated oil tanker ban for BC’s north coast. The Bloc Quebecois have seemingly nothing to lose, and may have something to gain, by supporting an oil tanker ban in BC. Thus, we have a likely majority of Parliament onside to support Bill C-502 or a similar bill that would ban north coast oil tankers. 
  • Dogwood is strategically building a community of supporters in key political ridings in BC to make sure that those politicians that support and work for an oil tanker ban get credit for this during the next federal election. 
  • Individual British Columbians are standing up like never before, with people like Norm Hann, Hannah and Tyese Cycling for the Sea, Frank Wolf and Todd McGowan, and Faroe des Roches, Curtis White, Ryan Vandecasteyen and Lisa Blachut.


Enbridge’s performance in Michigan gets the reality of spills into the news; but a bigger train has always been coming at them.

The core of the No Tankers plan is to continue to build the movement in anticipation of the next federal election, and to encourage all of the federal Opposition Parties to work together, and to work for us, by moving oil tanker ban legislation through the House this fall. If that’s going to happen, they need to continue to hear from us.

The good news is we make that easy! You can send a letter to all three leaders of the Opposition Parties by clicking here.

David Winn says:
Aug 06, 2010 01:07 PM
Speak for Canada!
mary michell says:
Aug 06, 2010 07:16 PM
I am a native from British Columbia, I have survived on salmon all my life, and my children grew up on salmon, we would like our ocean to be free of oil and kept clean. It is not fair for us, that you get rich on another country, and we suffer. Because of the oil, going to another country, you look at the money, and we want our salmon for survival.we do not wish to look at black salmon, full of oil, and our seafood, we would like to see our seafood, in good condition. And we would like to see no oil on our seafood, that is our survival. Hope you think twice aboout all this, Thank you and appreciate your time to read my e-mail
jim says:
Aug 06, 2010 08:18 PM
It's all about money. Money supercedes health and our environment. But, we need to keep fighting back always.
Woody Ensminger says:
Aug 07, 2010 04:45 PM
The Governments of BC and Canada need to actually begin to pay attention to the concerns of it's citizens in all areas where they are charged with responsibility to develop balanced, wise policy. It is my responsibility and the responsibility of other citizens to stay abreast of and open to new information that is the basis that informs new policy. My particular philosophical bias is "to none harm."

Elected officials have a responsibility in a democracy to listen to and take direction from their constituents. It is my understanding that 80% of the electorate of BC does not want tanker traffic along it's coastal waters. So if you would please begin to "do the right thing," perhaps we can actually become a democracy instead of paying lip service the the idea.

With all thanks, Woody Ensminger, Victoria, BC
Capt Ralph says:
Aug 07, 2010 04:46 PM
In 1977 we achieved a 30 year moratorium on oil pipelines and tanker traffic on the BC Coast. You would think that in the ensuing 30 years we would have collectively gotten smarter, more knowledgeable, and with greater sense than in 1977. But no, big money makes big stupidity, totally blinds some politicians and greedy business dudes. I have suggested that anybody who promotes oil activity on the BC Coast offer their lives when the oil disaster happens. Put your life on the dotted line, sacrifice your stupid self for not being aware of the probabilities. Put your life where your money and your mouth is. Radical idea? No more radical than to risk the BC Coast to oil pollution. Get a grip while you still have time. Save all our lives, please.
Richard says:
Aug 07, 2010 04:47 PM
 I am saddened to think that we as BC residents actually have to fight and argue to keep these tankers and pipelines away from our interior and coastline. I would hope that to most people it is obvious that we must do our utmost to prevent these projects from going ahead. Let us not support Alberta in it's folly.
Ann says:
Aug 23, 2010 03:54 PM
The Harper government must be insane to endorse this project after what's happened in the Gulf of Mexico and Michigan.

Harper only cares about Alberta and big oil business..not the Canadian people or the environment. Corporate greed is all that seems to matter nowadays.

It's time for a change in Ottawa!
Heather McLean says:
Aug 23, 2010 03:56 PM
Stand up for the life of the ocean. Ban oil tankers in the BC's coastal waters.
Ingmar Lee says:
Aug 23, 2010 03:56 PM
I`d have to agree wih Eric, -that it is abundantly clear that the Enbridge tar-sands mega-project is nothing but a pipe-dream now. But it`s regretable to see all these professional, due-process bound, charitable-status-guarding bureaucratic ENGO`s now jockeying for the `leadership` role in the fight. It has always been clear that this victory was far beyong the capabilities of due-process environmentalism, -that cooperating and participating with due-process was totally irrelevant to the fight. It was the critical mass of First Nation and Grass-Roots power that has resulted in this victory,-nothing to do with archaic, somnolent, old-school structured ENGO`s. In the aftermath of the disgusting Enbridge effort, it`s unfortunate to see the tired old guard struggling to get credit for this victory.
Alan Hedley says:
Aug 23, 2010 03:56 PM
Dogwood Eric’s riding – riding;
Dogwood Eric’s riding on the Greyhound bus.
Oh, he’s riding for you, he’s riding for us;
Dogwood Eric’s riding on the Greyhound bus.

He’s riding for the oceans, he’s riding for the fish;
Dogwood Eric’s riding for our place in all of this.
He’s riding for the mountains, he’s riding for the trees;
Dogwood Eric’s riding for our children yet-to-be.

Dogwood Eric’s riding – riding;
Dogwood Eric’s riding on the Greyhound bus.
Oh, he’s riding for you, he’s riding for us;
Dogwood Eric’s riding on the Greyhound bus.
D says:
Sep 16, 2010 01:59 PM
We do not want the risks associated with oil extraction, but yet we continue to heavily rely on it. To 'stomach' these oil spills happening in other countries with perhaps less democratic options for protection than ourselves is to be as greedy as Enbridge itself. If we get to keep our coastlines clean, we need take the steps to make sure ALL coastlines stay clean by fiercely supporting alternatives to oil. Canada needs to be a leader in the shift to green energy and sadly we are a far cry from it.
David Friesen says:
Sep 16, 2010 01:59 PM
Kayaking from Prince Rupert to Bella Coola (2 month trip) I had wonderful encounters with killer and humpback whales, dolphins, sea lions, seals and wolves, all living in a pristine environment. The sandy beaches were beautiful, devoid of human debris and I rarely saw boats of any kind. What a magnificent treasure we have. Please stop considering oil tankers and leave this ecosystem intact for our children and grandchildren to enjoy.
Add comment

You can add a comment by filling out the form below. Plain text formatting. Comments are moderated.

Stand up for BC. Join us.

Join the Conversation

Like us on facebookFollow us on twitter FOLLOW US